<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Additional HMO Licensing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2010/08/05/additional-hmo-licensing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2010/08/05/additional-hmo-licensing/</link>
	<description>A practitioners landlord and tenant law blog from PainSmith Solicitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Landlords Oxford &#124; Landlord Portfolio</title>
		<link>http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2010/08/05/additional-hmo-licensing/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Private Landlords Oxford &#124; Landlord Portfolio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/?p=449#comment-1467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] s1);})();Mouse here forRelated LinksRelated LinksAdditional HMO LicensingShare and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] s1);})();Mouse here forRelated LinksRelated LinksAdditional HMO LicensingShare and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oxford Challenged Over HMO Licensing</title>
		<link>http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2010/08/05/additional-hmo-licensing/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oxford Challenged Over HMO Licensing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/?p=449#comment-682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have previously posted on this issue and as a result of discussions that sprang from that post we have been instructed to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have previously posted on this issue and as a result of discussions that sprang from that post we have been instructed to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oxford Challenged Over HMO Licensing &#171; FreeLegalWeb</title>
		<link>http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2010/08/05/additional-hmo-licensing/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oxford Challenged Over HMO Licensing &#171; FreeLegalWeb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/?p=449#comment-665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] decision to make an additional licensing designation for the whole of Oxford. We have previously posted on this issue and as a result of discussions that sprang from that post we have been instructed to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decision to make an additional licensing designation for the whole of Oxford. We have previously posted on this issue and as a result of discussions that sprang from that post we have been instructed to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oxford Challenged Over HMO Licensing &#171; Painsmith Landlord and Tenant Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2010/08/05/additional-hmo-licensing/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oxford Challenged Over HMO Licensing &#171; Painsmith Landlord and Tenant Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/?p=449#comment-663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have previously posted on this issue and as a result of discussions that sprang from that post we have been instructed to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have previously posted on this issue and as a result of discussions that sprang from that post we have been instructed to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Voluntary HMO Licensing Scheme &#171; Renting Flats in London</title>
		<link>http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2010/08/05/additional-hmo-licensing/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Voluntary HMO Licensing Scheme &#171; Renting Flats in London]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/?p=449#comment-534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] PainSmith Solicitors believe that this scheme has the potential to be challenged, and having spoken to counsel are prepared to discuss the possibility of taking such a challenge forward on a no win, no fee basis if a group of interested landlords wished to come forward. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PainSmith Solicitors believe that this scheme has the potential to be challenged, and having spoken to counsel are prepared to discuss the possibility of taking such a challenge forward on a no win, no fee basis if a group of interested landlords wished to come forward. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

